I found this a Q&A on the InCopy Secrets website:
Can you explain again why the remote workflow won’t work with remote designers?
Well, I suppose it can, if the remote (offsite) designer keeps the layout on their home computer, creates assignments there, and then sends out e-mail-based assignments (InCopy packages) to the editors (and they return InDesign packages back to her). In other words, if you keep the workflow all remote, it can work. I actually have a few clients, some with over 60 people around the country, who are putting together publications in this way.
But when people ask this, they almost always have something different in mind. They’re thinking that the designer could “bring work home” by sending a package to himself at the end of the day, or that the editors could unpack the packages on the server since they’re all on the network, or that a production manager could create an InDesign package for a subcontracted, off-site designer.
None of those work.
Can someone explain WHY this doesn't work? Does the package not open or?
I'm trying to help a client explore the InCopy workflow but they have a setup where assignments may need to worked on by multiple designers (last-minute changes before sending to printer and original designer is unavailable for example). In a situation like this, would a new designer be able to open the ICAP sent from InCopy, or can the packages ONLY be opened in InDesign by the computer that created the export initially? Alternate designers would have access to the packages because instead of email, they must save the packages to an FTP site and Designer and Editor would download the indp/icap then open on their computer.
I was looking at Rorohiko's StoryTweaker as an alternative, too. Does anyone have any first-hand experience with that as compared to working with InCopy? Does that allow multiple designers to be involved?
Thanks!